B2B buyer guide · 8 vendors · 8 procurement axes · 2026
Best AI Video Generators for Business — 2026 B2B Buyer Guide
The creator-intent listicle ranks tools by output quality and per-clip price. This page re-ranks the same field on the eight axes a marketing director, agency CFO, or procurement lead actually scores against — licensing clarity, vendor stability, team seats, DPA, SOC 2, invoicing, volume headroom. Includes a 5-step procurement playbook and a $300 bake-off budget.
By Jay Yang·Editor, AI Video Technology·11 min read·
Key facts at a glance
Tools evaluated
8 vendors
Ranking axes
8 B2B procurement criteria
Top pick
Seedance 2.0
Disqualified mid-cycle
Sora 2 (API sunset Sep 24)
Cheapest team entry
Seedance 2.0 — $15 credit pack
Updated
May 2026
Sources: OpenAI Sora product page, ByteDance Seed launch posts, Google DeepMind, Adobe Firefly product page, Volcengine Ark documentation. Verified May 2026.
Buyer verdict
Choose the procurement profile that matches your org
Choose Seedance 2.0 if
- ✓You need predictable per-clip cost with no monthly reset
- ✓Multi-reference brand consistency is non-negotiable
- ✓You want commercial licensing bundled with every plan
- ✓Vendor stability matters (no sunset risk on the roadmap)
Choose Veo 3.1 / Runway / Synthesia instead if
- ○Already on Google Workspace + Vertex AI → Veo 3.1
- ○Need explicit team seats, asset library, SSO → Runway
- ○Avatar-led training / sales enablement → Synthesia
- ○Legal requires IP indemnification in contract → Adobe Firefly
Sora 2 is on this list ranked last — see the explicit reason in the tool grid below. For the migration playbook off Sora, see Sora alternative.
Top 8 — ranked on B2B axes
The eight vendors that consistently land on enterprise shortlists
Ranking reflects a weighted score across all eight axes. The order changes by use case — the in-card "why here" and "not ideal if" notes tell you when to deviate from the default rank.
- 1Stable
Seedance 2.0
Vendor: ByteDance
ByteDance's 2026 main video model line, distributed globally via Volcengine Ark and through Seedance2Video for hosted English access.
- Best for
- Marketing teams that need predictable per-clip cost, multi-reference brand consistency, and a non-sunsetting vendor.
- Pricing
- Credit packs $15 / $39 / $69 / $129 (12-month validity); monthly plans $29 / $79 / $149.
- Public API
- Yes — public API via Volcengine Ark; hosted access via Seedance2Video.
- Audio
- Native
Why it earns the rank
Seedance 2.0 lands at #1 on the B2B axis because three procurement risks collapse to zero at once: vendor stability (no announced sunset), pricing predictability (one-time credit packs that do not expire monthly), and licensing clarity (commercial use bundled, no separate enterprise tier required). Multi-reference generation is the single capability most agencies say is the deciding factor for brand-asset workflows. The team-seat story is the weakest box on the card — shared workspaces are on the roadmap rather than a current feature — but for teams under ten seats the shared-credit-pack workaround is straightforward.
Not ideal if
You require SAML SSO, audit-grade SOC 2 attestation, or contractually negotiated data residency in a specific region. For those constraints, see Veo 3.1 or Runway Gen-4.5.
Commercial: Commercial use included on every paid plan and credit pack. No per-output royalty. Watermark removed on paid output.
- 2Stable
Veo 3.1
Vendor: Google DeepMind
Google DeepMind's native-audio video model, bundled inside Google AI Pro / Ultra and exposed via Vertex AI for enterprise.
- Best for
- Organisations already deep in Google Workspace, Vertex AI, or GCP — the procurement path reuses an existing Google contract.
- Pricing
- Google AI Pro from $7.99/mo (consumer bundle); Google AI Ultra for full Veo 3.1 access (spatial audio, longer clips); Vertex AI for usage-based enterprise.
- Public API
- Yes — Vertex AI / Gemini API.
- Audio
- Native
Why it earns the rank
Veo 3.1 is the default choice when the org already has a Google Workspace agreement. SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / data-residency commitments are in the existing Google contract; you do not have to onboard a new vendor. The cost story is uneven: $7.99/mo on Google AI Pro is the cheapest entry to a native-audio video model, but full Veo 3.1 capabilities sit behind Google AI Ultra, which is materially more expensive for high volume.
Not ideal if
You are not on Google Workspace, you do not want to layer in Vertex AI billing, or you need multi-reference brand-asset generation (Veo 3.1 does not offer multi-reference).
Commercial: Standard Google terms; enterprise customers get the Google Workspace DPA and SLA. Output usage governed by the consumer Generative AI Additional Terms.
- 3Stable
Runway Gen-4.5
Vendor: Runway
Runway's 2026 model line, the long-standing B2B video tool with team workspaces, asset libraries, and the deepest editor integration.
- Best for
- Established creative teams that already standardise on Runway for editing, motion graphics, and rotoscoping.
- Pricing
- Standard $15/mo, Pro $35/mo, Unlimited $95/mo (team seats priced separately).
- Public API
- Yes — Runway API (production-ready, stable terms).
- Audio
- No
Why it earns the rank
Runway is the B2B vendor agencies have actually procured for years. The platform has explicit team seats, shared asset libraries, role-based access, and an editor that is recognisable to anyone who has used After Effects. The downside on the B2B axis is the missing audio layer — every production needs a separate audio pipeline. Stability and contractability are the strongest reasons to choose it.
Not ideal if
Audio-first workflows (no native audio); cost-conscious teams generating large volume (Unlimited at $95/mo is the only sustainable high-volume tier).
Commercial: Pro and above include commercial usage rights with team workspace IP protection terms.
- 4Stable
Kling 3.0
Vendor: Kuaishou
Kuaishou's 2026 video model — native 4K, native audio with five-language lip-sync, up to six-cut storyboards in a single generation.
- Best for
- Asia-region marketing teams, brands with significant Chinese-character on-frame text, or teams that need 4K natively.
- Pricing
- Entry from ~$6.99/mo; higher tiers for batch quotas; team pricing on request.
- Public API
- Yes — Kuaishou-operated API.
- Audio
- Native
Why it earns the rank
Kling 3.0 is the most capability-dense option per dollar — native 4K, native audio, multi-cut storyboarding, and an entry price below $7/mo. For teams whose primary risk is "how much fidelity do I get per pack", it is hard to beat. The procurement friction is non-Chinese invoicing and DPA workflows; for an Asia-headquartered team this is no friction at all, but North-American CFOs sometimes flag it.
Not ideal if
Your procurement office requires a US- or EU-domiciled vendor, or you need formal SOC 2 attestation as an audit deliverable.
Commercial: Commercial use permitted on paid plans; review the platform terms for regional clauses.
- 5Stable
Pika 2.5
Vendor: Pika Labs
Pika's 2026 release, focused on quick social-format generation and lipsync features for talking-head clips.
- Best for
- Small social teams running high-volume short-form content with a small budget and minimal procurement overhead.
- Pricing
- Standard $10/mo, Pro $35/mo, Enterprise on request.
- Public API
- Limited — partner API on request.
- Audio
- Via external
Why it earns the rank
Pika is the easy-to-procure budget tier. It is what a four-person social team uses when they want one credit card, one workspace, and outputs ready in under a minute. It is not where a 50-person agency runs an enterprise rollout. The lipsync feature is a real plus for talking-head reels.
Not ideal if
You need API-first automation, multi-region data residency, or brand-asset consistency across long campaigns.
Commercial: Commercial rights on paid plans. Pro tier preferred for client-deliverable work.
- 6Stable
Synthesia
Vendor: Synthesia
Avatar-first video platform — the established B2B leader for internal training videos, sales enablement, and L&D content.
- Best for
- Internal training, sales enablement, multilingual product docs — anywhere a presenter avatar is preferable to a generated scene.
- Pricing
- Starter $29/mo (limited), Creator $89/mo, Enterprise from $20K/year (custom).
- Public API
- Yes — robust API + integrations (LMS, Salesforce, Slack).
- Audio
- Native
Why it earns the rank
Synthesia is the procurement-ready answer when the use case is "avatar reads a script in 30 languages." It is not a Sora / Seedance replacement — it is a different category, but it lives on the same shortlist when finance asks "what AI video tools do we already buy?" Include it here so the buying committee has a complete map.
Not ideal if
Your use case is generated cinematic scenes, B-roll, product motion, or anything other than an avatar-led explainer.
Commercial: Standard B2B SaaS — DPA, MSA, SLA available on Enterprise. SOC 2 Type II, GDPR.
- 7Stable
Adobe Firefly Video
Vendor: Adobe
Adobe's generative video model, embedded in Premiere Pro and Creative Cloud — the safest indemnification posture for IP-sensitive work.
- Best for
- Enterprises that already standardise on Creative Cloud and need Adobe's commercial-IP indemnification as a contractual deliverable.
- Pricing
- Creative Cloud All Apps from $59.99/mo; Firefly Premium add-on for higher generation caps; Enterprise via Adobe sales.
- Public API
- Yes — Firefly Services API (enterprise tier).
- Audio
- No
Why it earns the rank
Adobe earns a B2B spot purely on contractability and indemnification. If legal needs Firefly's "trained on licensed and public-domain content only" posture in writing, no other vendor on this list matches it. The pure model quality currently trails Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1, and Kling 3.0 — Firefly Video is improving fast but not yet at frontier. The licensing posture is the reason this is on a shortlist for regulated industries.
Not ideal if
You are not already on Creative Cloud, or you need frontier model fidelity for cinematic / character-driven generation.
Commercial: Adobe IP indemnification on Firefly output. Standard Adobe Enterprise contracts (DPA, SOC 2, SAML SSO).
- 8Sunsetting
OpenAI Sora 2
Vendor: OpenAI
OpenAI's 2025 video model — included with ChatGPT Plus / Pro and exposed via API. Currently in active sunset.
- Best for
- Existing Sora users with cached generations who need to extract value before the announced sunset dates.
- Pricing
- Bundled with ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo, 720p cap) or ChatGPT Pro ($200/mo, 1080p). Sora API priced per generation.
- Public API
- Yes — but the API sunsets September 24, 2026.
- Audio
- Ambient only
Why it earns the rank
Sora 2 ranks last on the B2B axis for one decisive reason: OpenAI has announced the Sora web and mobile app surfaces close on April 26, 2026, and the Sora API closes on September 24, 2026. Procuring a workflow on a sunsetting product is a B2B anti-pattern. It is included here because finance teams and CMOs still see Sora as the default and need an explicit reason to redirect the budget. See the migration playbook for the cutover details.
Not ideal if
Any new procurement decision in 2026 — by definition, you are buying into a deprecation window.
Commercial: Standard OpenAI usage terms. Enterprise contracts available via OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise.
8-axis scoring matrix
The full scorecard — 1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Weight each axis by what your finance, legal, and creative leads actually care about. Default ranking above uses an even-weighted sum; override to match your procurement profile.
| Tool | Commercial licensing clarity | Vendor stability (multi-year) | Pricing predictability | Team seats / shared workspace | Volume cap headroom | Brand-asset consistency | Invoicing + VAT | Data residency / SOC 2 / DPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Seedance 2.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| 2. Veo 3.1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 3. Runway Gen-4.5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 4. Kling 3.0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 5. Pika 2.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 6. Synthesia | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 7. Adobe Firefly Video | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 8. OpenAI Sora 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
Commercial licensing clarity
Whether commercial use is plainly bundled (high) or hidden behind a higher tier / separate license (low). Indemnification is a bonus.
Weight: High — first thing legal will ask about.
Vendor stability (multi-year)
Is the product on a sunset schedule, an early-access experiment, or a stable multi-year line? Sora 2 fails this axis; Adobe / Google / Runway score high.
Weight: Critical — sunsetting tools are immediately disqualified.
Pricing predictability
Predictable: credit packs with multi-month validity, fixed monthly tiers. Unpredictable: usage-based API only, opaque enterprise quotes.
Weight: High — CFO needs a forecastable line item.
Team seats / shared workspace
Native role-based seats, shared asset libraries, audit log. Solo-tier-only tools score low.
Weight: High for teams 5+; nice-to-have under 5.
Volume cap headroom
How much output the tool can produce per month before forcing a custom enterprise contract.
Weight: High for agencies and high-output SMBs.
Brand-asset consistency
Multi-reference generation, style lock, character lock — the difference between "a series of clips" and "a campaign".
Weight: High for branded campaigns; medium for one-offs.
Invoicing + VAT
Proper VAT invoices, named-entity billing, PO numbers, monthly statements. Card-only tools score low.
Weight: High in EU; medium elsewhere.
Data residency / SOC 2 / DPA
Region-pinned data, SOC 2 Type II attestation, signed DPA, named sub-processor list. Required in regulated industries.
Weight: Critical in finance / healthcare / EU public sector.
5-step playbook · ~1 week · bake-off budget under $300
Procurement playbook for AI video vendors
The structured path a marketing director or agency procurement lead follows in 2026 — works for teams of three or three hundred.
- 1
Frame the actual job-to-be-done
Write one paragraph that names: (a) the content format (talking-head explainer / product B-roll / branded campaign / training video), (b) the monthly output volume, (c) the audience (internal / external / paid placement), and (d) the redistribution surface (organic social / paid social / TV / internal LMS). The same vendor scores differently against each of these. A 50-clip-per-month branded campaign on Meta Ads is a Seedance 2.0 procurement; a 30-language internal compliance training video is a Synthesia procurement.
- 2
Disqualify on stability and licensing first
Before evaluating output, remove any vendor that fails the two non-negotiable B2B axes: vendor stability (no sunsetting products) and commercial licensing clarity. As of May 2026 this immediately eliminates Sora 2 from any new procurement (API sunsets September 24, 2026). For regulated industries, also disqualify vendors that cannot produce a DPA and a SOC 2 Type II report on request.
- 3
Score the remaining field on the eight B2B axes
Use the matrix below. Each axis is 1–5; weight by what your finance, legal, and creative leads actually care about. The top three after scoring become the bake-off pool. For most agencies and SMBs in 2026, the top three are Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1, and Runway Gen-4.5 — in that order, with one to two swaps based on Google Workspace status and brand-consistency requirements.
- 4
Run a bounded bake-off (one week, three real prompts)
Take three real production prompts — one talking-head, one product motion, one brand-led narrative — and generate the same brief on every shortlisted vendor. Score on output fidelity, brand-asset adherence, audio quality, and how many post-fixes you needed. A week-long bake-off avoids both vendor-pitched demo videos and analysis paralysis. Budget under $200 across all tools combined; credit packs make this feasible without subscription commitments.
- 5
Negotiate, then commit to one quarter
For credit-pack vendors, simply size the first pack to one quarter of expected volume — there is nothing to negotiate. For subscription vendors, ask explicitly about annual prepay discount, team-seat tiers, and whether the DPA can be amended for your specific region. Sign for one quarter, then re-evaluate against actual usage. Avoid the 12-month annual commit on a 2026 video tool — the model field is still moving too fast.
Glossary
B2B procurement vocabulary
- DPA
- Data Processing Addendum. The contractual document that defines how a vendor processes your data on your behalf — required under GDPR for any vendor handling personal data.
- SOC 2 Type II
- An audit attestation covering security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls over a period (typically 6–12 months). Required by enterprise procurement for any vendor handling sensitive data.
- Credit pack
- A one-time prepaid balance of generation credits with a multi-month validity window. Unlike a subscription seat, credit packs do not require ongoing commitment and unspent balance does not reset monthly.
- Multi-reference generation
- A generation mode that accepts multiple reference images per request, pinning subject, style, and brand assets across the output. The deciding capability for branded campaign consistency.
- Indemnification
- A contractual commitment by the vendor to defend the customer against third-party IP claims arising from the model output. Adobe Firefly is the leading example in this category.
- Bake-off
- A bounded multi-vendor evaluation in which the same brief is run on every shortlisted tool. The standard B2B procurement method for software where demo videos cannot substitute for hands-on results.
- Sunset
- A vendor-announced product end-of-life. Procuring on a sunset path is a B2B anti-pattern; the only reasonable use is extracting value from existing entitlement before the date.
People also ask
Common B2B buyer questions
Q.What is the best AI video generator for a marketing team in 2026?
For most marketing teams the highest-leverage choice is Seedance 2.0 — it offers commercial licensing on every paid plan, predictable credit-pack pricing with 12-month validity, multi-reference brand-asset generation, and a non-sunsetting vendor roadmap. If you are already standardised on Google Workspace, Veo 3.1 via Vertex AI is the next-best procurement path. Runway Gen-4.5 remains the safest choice for teams that need explicit shared workspaces and SOC 2-style contractability.
Q.Which AI video tools have a public API for automation?
Seedance 2.0 (via Volcengine Ark, with hosted access through Seedance2Video), Veo 3.1 (via Vertex AI / Gemini API), Runway Gen-4.5 (Runway API), Kling 3.0 (Kuaishou API), Synthesia (LMS / sales integrations), and Adobe Firefly Video (Firefly Services API, enterprise tier). Sora 2 has a public API but it sunsets on September 24, 2026, so it is not a viable target for any new automation built in 2026.
Q.Is there an AI video generator that includes commercial licensing on every plan?
Yes — Seedance 2.0 includes commercial use on every paid credit pack and subscription, with no separate enterprise tier required to unlock it and no per-output royalty. Kling 3.0 and Pika 2.5 also include commercial rights on paid plans. Veo 3.1, Runway, and Synthesia bundle commercial rights but at higher tiers. Adobe Firefly Video uniquely offers IP indemnification as a contractual deliverable, which is the strongest commercial posture in the field.
Q.How do I get a DPA or SOC 2 report from an AI video vendor?
For Google Veo (via Workspace / Vertex AI), Adobe Firefly Video, Runway, and Synthesia, the DPA and SOC 2 Type II report are available through the standard enterprise sales motion — request a Trust Center login or ask your account executive. For Seedance 2.0 (via Seedance2Video), contact [email protected] for a DPA. Kling 3.0 and Pika 2.5 currently require direct vendor engagement; expect longer turnaround.
Q.Can I avoid a monthly subscription for AI video generation?
Yes — Seedance 2.0 credit packs ($15 / $39 / $69 / $129) are one-time purchases with 12-month validity, no subscription. This is the only mainstream B2B-viable credit-pack option in the 2026 field. Every other vendor on this list runs on subscription or usage-based API billing. Credit packs are particularly well-suited to project-based work with uneven monthly volume.
Q.Which AI video generator is best for global multilingual campaigns?
Seedance 2.0 leads on multilingual lip-sync (the audio model is purpose-built for multiple languages and matches mouth motion to dialogue). Kling 3.0 offers five-language lip-sync natively. Synthesia is the leader for avatar-led multilingual content with 140+ languages. Veo 3.1 generates audio in a wide range of languages but does not currently advertise lip-sync as a first-class feature.
Sourced claims
Every load-bearing claim, with a citation
- 1
OpenAI is sunsetting Sora 2 across consumer and API surfaces in 2026.
OpenAI announced that the Sora web app and Sora mobile app shut down on April 26, 2026, and that the Sora API endpoint closes on September 24, 2026. As a B2B procurement criterion, this disqualifies Sora 2 from any new vendor selection in 2026.
Source: OpenAI — Sora product page
- 2
Seedance 2.0 is an actively maintained ByteDance video model with public distribution.
ByteDance Seed published the Seedance 2.0 launch announcement on February 12, 2026. The model is documented on Volcengine Ark with pricing and licensing terms, and has its own Wikipedia entry. No discontinuation has been announced.
- 3
Veo 3.1 is distributed through Google AI Pro / Ultra and Vertex AI for enterprise.
Google has bundled Veo 3.1 inside Google AI Pro (consumer entry from $7.99/mo) with full capabilities reserved for Google AI Ultra. Enterprise access runs via Vertex AI, which reuses existing Google Cloud contracts, DPA, and SOC 2 posture.
Source: Google DeepMind — Veo
- 4
Adobe Firefly Video provides IP indemnification on enterprise plans.
Adobe extends commercial indemnification to Firefly outputs on enterprise plans, citing that the underlying Firefly models are trained on Adobe Stock, licensed content, and public-domain material. This is the strongest contractual IP posture currently available in the AI-video category.
Source: Adobe Firefly product page
FAQ
More on contracts, onboarding, and bake-off mechanics
How is this list different from the general best-AI-video-generator listicle?
The creator-intent listicle ranks by output quality, per-clip cost, and Elo. This page re-ranks the same vendor field on eight procurement axes — commercial licensing, vendor stability, pricing predictability, team seats, volume headroom, brand-asset consistency, invoicing, and data residency. The two pages overlap on vendors but diverge significantly on rank. Synthesia and Adobe Firefly Video, for instance, do not appear on the creator listicle but earn B2B shortlist spots here.
Why is Sora 2 still on the list if it is being sunset?
Because it is the default mental model for non-technical CMOs and CFOs evaluating AI video. Including it on the shortlist — and explicitly ranking it last for vendor stability — gives the buying committee a documented reason to redirect the budget toward a non-sunsetting alternative. The migration playbook covers the cutover details.
Do these vendors support invoicing in our preferred currency?
Most do. Google, Runway, Adobe, and Synthesia support multi-currency enterprise billing, USD/EUR/GBP invoicing, and VAT-compliant statements out of the box. Seedance 2.0 (via Seedance2Video) bills in USD and issues PDF receipts compatible with most accounting workflows; ask support for a custom-entity invoice if your finance team requires named-billing. Kling 3.0 and Pika 2.5 bill primarily in USD; large-volume EUR invoicing may require direct vendor engagement.
What is the realistic bake-off budget for evaluating 4–5 vendors?
Under $300 total for a one-week bake-off across the top four vendors. Seedance 2.0 Mini Pack ($15), Veo 3.1 via Google AI Pro one-month ($7.99), Runway Standard one-month ($15), Kling 3.0 one-month (~$7), Pika Standard one-month ($10). Adobe Firefly Video evaluation typically runs through your existing Creative Cloud entitlement. Synthesia provides evaluation seats through enterprise sales.
Which tools have the strongest SSO / SAML support?
Adobe Firefly Video (full Adobe Admin Console SSO), Synthesia (SAML + SCIM on Enterprise), Runway (SSO on Unlimited / Enterprise), and Veo 3.1 (via Google Workspace / Vertex AI SSO). Seedance 2.0 access on Seedance2Video does not currently expose SAML SSO — workaround is per-user accounts with shared credit pack billing. Kling 3.0 and Pika 2.5 do not advertise SAML on standard plans.
How quickly can we onboard the team to a new AI video tool?
For Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Pika 2.5, and Runway: same day. The web UI is the deliverable; account setup is the only blocker. For Veo 3.1 via Vertex AI: a few days if you already have a Google Cloud project; a few weeks if you are spinning up GCP for the first time. For Synthesia Enterprise and Adobe Firefly Services API: one to four weeks for procurement and SSO provisioning.
Should we annual-prepay or stay on monthly?
Monthly for at least the first quarter. The 2026 AI video model field is moving fast enough that locking in 12 months on any one vendor — except Seedance 2.0 credit packs, which never expire monthly — risks being stuck on a model that is outclassed within two quarters. Re-evaluate at the end of each quarter against the current state of the leaderboard.
Is there a workflow that combines two of these tools?
Yes, and many B2B teams run a two-tool stack: Seedance 2.0 for cinematic / scene-led content and Synthesia for avatar-led training / sales enablement. The two cover different jobs-to-be-done with no overlap. A second common stack is Runway for editing-heavy work plus Veo 3.1 or Seedance 2.0 for raw generation.
Start the bake-off today
$15 Mini Pack — run your three benchmark prompts on the #1 pick
Credit packs do not expire monthly. Buy once, run the bake-off, keep the unused balance for the next campaign.
Related reading
Best AI Video Generator — creator-intent ranking
/best-ai-video-generator
Best AI Video Generator for Ads
/best-ai-video-generator-for-ads
Seedance Commercial Use — licensing details
/seedance-commercial-use
Sora Alternative — migration playbook
/sora-alternative
Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3
/seedance-vs-veo
Pricing — credit packs and team plans
/pricing